Two shoddy articles in the Coloradoan yesterday.
No matter how you feel about Doug Bruce, is it really "journalism" to run a story entitled "Unlike lawmaker, children say kicking is wrong."? That's pretty juvenile. It's certainly not journalism. This type of pettiness doesn't reflect well on the professionalism of the Coloradoan.
Second is this story about the Larimer DA's re-election bid.
Inexplicably, the third paragraph of the story decided to delve into the Masters controversy. Why? This took place long before Larry Abrahamson was in charge. So why is it included in a political story about his re-election?
Imagine if the third paragraph in the story about Representative Kefalas' re-election bid was about how the state legislature "is under intense scrutiny" for a bill passed before he took office. It's a bit incongruous, no? But there it is in the story about Larry Abrahamson.
Oh, and note the weak writing that Abrahamson "...says he had little to do with the case." That's reporting? Did he or didn't he have anything to do with the case?
Leaving it up to an Abrahamson denial creates a "When did you stop beating your wife?" construct.
How does this type of stuff make it into print?
(The irony of the Abrahamson story is that, if anything, he should be commended for re-opening the Masters issue and spending a not-insignificant portion of his budget to have a full public hearing.)
UPDATE: It has been correctly pointed out to me that Larry Abrahamson did not, in fact, "re-open" the case. He is, however, in a very difficult position. In order to see justice done, he has had to take a position that could pit him against the actions of his predecessors and the actions of law enforcement. Abrahamson should be commended for his openness and willingness to get to the bottom of this.