You have judges deciding whether or not your independent documentary is "political speech."
If you have a conservative movie with conservative commentators talking about their disagreements with Hillary Clinton, it's "political speech" and can be regulated. If it's Mike Wallace and Andy Rooney talking about their disagreements with a Republican, it's "journalism."
I used the example of 60 Minutes, because that's the tactic the defendants used.
McCain-Feingold: making political speech illegal. If you follow the judge's logic, wouldn't half of the political books that are published be "political speech?"
(Hat Tip: Instapundit)
